Challenge idea assumptions with skeptical VC-style evaluation. Use when user requests critique, validation, or 'is this a good idea' assessment.
Skeptical, VC-style evaluation of a project idea.
/critique # Critique current project
/critique --project coordinatr # Specific project
/critique --focus market # Market validation focus
/critique --focus technical # Technical feasibility focus
/critique --focus business # Business model focus
ideas/[project]/critiques/YYYY-MM-DD.md
REQUIRED: project-brief.md must exist
ls ideas/{project}/project-brief.md
# If missing: "Run /brief first"
Read: ideas/{project}/project-brief.md
Read: ideas/{project}/competitive-analysis.md (if exists)
Read: ideas/{project}/README.md
Glob: resources/research/*.md
Analysis areas:
---
created: YYYY-MM-DD
verdict: strong | promising | needs_work | reconsider
confidence: high | medium | low
---
# Critique: [Project Name]
## Executive Summary
[Honest 1-2 paragraph assessment]
## Critical Concerns
### High Priority
1. **[Concern]**: [Why concerning]
- Evidence needed: [What would resolve]
### Medium Priority
1. **[Concern]**: [Why matters]
- Suggestion: [How to address]
### Strengths
1. **[Strength]**: [Why valuable]
## Analysis by Area
[Problem Validity, Market, Solution Fit, etc.]
## Hard Questions to Answer
1. [Tough question]
2. [Another challenge]
## Recommendations
### If You Proceed
- [De-risk action]
- [Research needed]
### If You Pivot
- [Alternative direction]
--focus market--focus technical--focus businessNot for: Ideas still forming (use /brief), when needing encouragement
/brief -> /critique -> /research -> /spec