Smithery Logo
MCPsSkillsDocsPricing
Login
NewFlame, an assistant that learns and improves. Available onTelegramSlack
    sickn33

    tdd-workflows-tdd-cycle

    sickn33/tdd-workflows-tdd-cycle
    Coding
    8,021

    About

    SKILL.md

    Install

    • Telegram
      Telegram
    • Slack
      Slack
    • Claude Code
      Claude Code
    • Codex
      Codex
    • OpenClaw
      OpenClaw
    • Cursor
      Cursor
    • Amp
      Amp
    • GitHub Copilot
      GitHub Copilot
    • Gemini CLI
      Gemini CLI
    • Kilo Code
      Kilo Code
    • Junie
      Junie
    • Replit
      Replit
    • Windsurf
      Windsurf
    • Cline
      Cline
    • Continue
      Continue
    • OpenCode
      OpenCode
    • OpenHands
      OpenHands
    • Roo Code
      Roo Code
    • Augment
      Augment
    • Goose
      Goose
    • Trae
      Trae
    • Zencoder
      Zencoder
    • Antigravity
      Antigravity
    • Download skill
    ├─
    ├─
    └─
    Smithery Logo

    Give agents more agency

    Resources

    DocumentationPrivacy PolicySystem Status

    Company

    PricingAboutBlog

    Connect

    © 2026 Smithery. All rights reserved.

    About

    Use when working with tdd workflows tdd cycle

    SKILL.md

    Use this skill when

    • Working on tdd workflows tdd cycle tasks or workflows
    • Needing guidance, best practices, or checklists for tdd workflows tdd cycle

    Do not use this skill when

    • The task is unrelated to tdd workflows tdd cycle
    • You need a different domain or tool outside this scope

    Instructions

    • Clarify goals, constraints, and required inputs.
    • Apply relevant best practices and validate outcomes.
    • Provide actionable steps and verification.
    • If detailed examples are required, open resources/implementation-playbook.md.

    Execute a comprehensive Test-Driven Development (TDD) workflow with strict red-green-refactor discipline:

    [Extended thinking: This workflow enforces test-first development through coordinated agent orchestration. Each phase of the TDD cycle is strictly enforced with fail-first verification, incremental implementation, and continuous refactoring. The workflow supports both single test and test suite approaches with configurable coverage thresholds.]

    Configuration

    Coverage Thresholds

    • Minimum line coverage: 80%
    • Minimum branch coverage: 75%
    • Critical path coverage: 100%

    Refactoring Triggers

    • Cyclomatic complexity > 10
    • Method length > 20 lines
    • Class length > 200 lines
    • Duplicate code blocks > 3 lines

    Phase 1: Test Specification and Design

    1. Requirements Analysis

    • Use Task tool with subagent_type="comprehensive-review::architect-review"
    • Prompt: "Analyze requirements for: $ARGUMENTS. Define acceptance criteria, identify edge cases, and create test scenarios. Output a comprehensive test specification."
    • Output: Test specification, acceptance criteria, edge case matrix
    • Validation: Ensure all requirements have corresponding test scenarios

    2. Test Architecture Design

    • Use Task tool with subagent_type="unit-testing::test-automator"
    • Prompt: "Design test architecture for: $ARGUMENTS based on test specification. Define test structure, fixtures, mocks, and test data strategy. Ensure testability and maintainability."
    • Output: Test architecture, fixture design, mock strategy
    • Validation: Architecture supports isolated, fast, reliable tests

    Phase 2: RED - Write Failing Tests

    3. Write Unit Tests (Failing)

    • Use Task tool with subagent_type="unit-testing::test-automator"
    • Prompt: "Write FAILING unit tests for: $ARGUMENTS. Tests must fail initially. Include edge cases, error scenarios, and happy paths. DO NOT implement production code."
    • Output: Failing unit tests, test documentation
    • CRITICAL: Verify all tests fail with expected error messages

    4. Verify Test Failure

    • Use Task tool with subagent_type="tdd-workflows::code-reviewer"
    • Prompt: "Verify that all tests for: $ARGUMENTS are failing correctly. Ensure failures are for the right reasons (missing implementation, not test errors). Confirm no false positives."
    • Output: Test failure verification report
    • GATE: Do not proceed until all tests fail appropriately

    Phase 3: GREEN - Make Tests Pass

    5. Minimal Implementation

    • Use Task tool with subagent_type="backend-development::backend-architect"
    • Prompt: "Implement MINIMAL code to make tests pass for: $ARGUMENTS. Focus only on making tests green. Do not add extra features or optimizations. Keep it simple."
    • Output: Minimal working implementation
    • Constraint: No code beyond what's needed to pass tests

    6. Verify Test Success

    • Use Task tool with subagent_type="unit-testing::test-automator"
    • Prompt: "Run all tests for: $ARGUMENTS and verify they pass. Check test coverage metrics. Ensure no tests were accidentally broken."
    • Output: Test execution report, coverage metrics
    • GATE: All tests must pass before proceeding

    Phase 4: REFACTOR - Improve Code Quality

    7. Code Refactoring

    • Use Task tool with subagent_type="tdd-workflows::code-reviewer"
    • Prompt: "Refactor implementation for: $ARGUMENTS while keeping tests green. Apply SOLID principles, remove duplication, improve naming, and optimize performance. Run tests after each refactoring."
    • Output: Refactored code, refactoring report
    • Constraint: Tests must remain green throughout

    8. Test Refactoring

    • Use Task tool with subagent_type="unit-testing::test-automator"
    • Prompt: "Refactor tests for: $ARGUMENTS. Remove test duplication, improve test names, extract common fixtures, and enhance test readability. Ensure tests still provide same coverage."
    • Output: Refactored tests, improved test structure
    • Validation: Coverage metrics unchanged or improved

    Phase 5: Integration and System Tests

    9. Write Integration Tests (Failing First)

    • Use Task tool with subagent_type="unit-testing::test-automator"
    • Prompt: "Write FAILING integration tests for: $ARGUMENTS. Test component interactions, API contracts, and data flow. Tests must fail initially."
    • Output: Failing integration tests
    • Validation: Tests fail due to missing integration logic

    10. Implement Integration

    • Use Task tool with subagent_type="backend-development::backend-architect"
    • Prompt: "Implement integration code for: $ARGUMENTS to make integration tests pass. Focus on component interaction and data flow."
    • Output: Integration implementation
    • Validation: All integration tests pass

    Phase 6: Continuous Improvement Cycle

    11. Performance and Edge Case Tests

    • Use Task tool with subagent_type="unit-testing::test-automator"
    • Prompt: "Add performance tests and additional edge case tests for: $ARGUMENTS. Include stress tests, boundary tests, and error recovery tests."
    • Output: Extended test suite
    • Metric: Increased test coverage and scenario coverage

    12. Final Code Review

    • Use Task tool with subagent_type="comprehensive-review::architect-review"
    • Prompt: "Perform comprehensive review of: $ARGUMENTS. Verify TDD process was followed, check code quality, test quality, and coverage. Suggest improvements."
    • Output: Review report, improvement suggestions
    • Action: Implement critical suggestions while maintaining green tests

    Incremental Development Mode

    For test-by-test development:

    1. Write ONE failing test
    2. Make ONLY that test pass
    3. Refactor if needed
    4. Repeat for next test

    Use this approach by adding --incremental flag to focus on one test at a time.

    Test Suite Mode

    For comprehensive test suite development:

    1. Write ALL tests for a feature/module (failing)
    2. Implement code to pass ALL tests
    3. Refactor entire module
    4. Add integration tests

    Use this approach by adding --suite flag for batch test development.

    Validation Checkpoints

    RED Phase Validation

    • All tests written before implementation
    • All tests fail with meaningful error messages
    • Test failures are due to missing implementation
    • No test passes accidentally

    GREEN Phase Validation

    • All tests pass
    • No extra code beyond test requirements
    • Coverage meets minimum thresholds
    • No test was modified to make it pass

    REFACTOR Phase Validation

    • All tests still pass after refactoring
    • Code complexity reduced
    • Duplication eliminated
    • Performance improved or maintained
    • Test readability improved

    Coverage Reports

    Generate coverage reports after each phase:

    • Line coverage
    • Branch coverage
    • Function coverage
    • Statement coverage

    Failure Recovery

    If TDD discipline is broken:

    1. STOP immediately
    2. Identify which phase was violated
    3. Rollback to last valid state
    4. Resume from correct phase
    5. Document lesson learned

    TDD Metrics Tracking

    Track and report:

    • Time in each phase (Red/Green/Refactor)
    • Number of test-implementation cycles
    • Coverage progression
    • Refactoring frequency
    • Defect escape rate

    Anti-Patterns to Avoid

    • Writing implementation before tests
    • Writing tests that already pass
    • Skipping the refactor phase
    • Writing multiple features without tests
    • Modifying tests to make them pass
    • Ignoring failing tests
    • Writing tests after implementation

    Success Criteria

    • 100% of code written test-first
    • All tests pass continuously
    • Coverage exceeds thresholds
    • Code complexity within limits
    • Zero defects in covered code
    • Clear test documentation
    • Fast test execution (< 5 seconds for unit tests)

    Notes

    • Enforce strict RED-GREEN-REFACTOR discipline
    • Each phase must be completed before moving to next
    • Tests are the specification
    • If a test is hard to write, the design needs improvement
    • Refactoring is NOT optional
    • Keep test execution fast
    • Tests should be independent and isolated

    TDD implementation for: $ARGUMENTS

    Limitations

    • Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
    • Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
    • Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.
    Recommended Servers
    StudioMeyer-Crew
    StudioMeyer-Crew
    OrgX
    OrgX
    VAT Validator MCP
    VAT Validator MCP
    Repository
    sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills
    Files