Codify your brand's writing style into a reusable voice guide.
Create an AI-optimized style guide — an operating manual that makes LLMs converge toward a specific voice instead of generic default output.
Detect from user input or ask:
For quantitative voice metrics (sentence length distribution, punctuation DNA, lexical diversity scores), use style-forensics — it produces Style DNA reports with exact numbers. This skill produces the qualitative operating manual that complements those metrics.
For thorough voice exploration before creating the guide, run:
/majestic-tools:interview "brand voice"
This triggers a conversational interview with voice-specific questions about identity, audience connection, tone boundaries, and existing patterns.
Use AskUserQuestion to gather initial context. Adapt phrasing to detected mode.
For personal voice:
"I'll help you create an AI style guide — a reusable document that makes AI write like you, not like generic AI.
Please provide one of these:
Option A - Writing Samples (Preferred) Share 3-5 pieces YOU wrote that represent your best voice:
Option B - Voice Interview If you don't have samples handy, I'll ask targeted questions:
React to examples rather than self-describe — specifics emerge faster."
For brand voice:
"I'll help you codify your brand voice into a reusable AI style guide.
Please provide one of these:
Option A - Existing Content (Preferred) Share 3-5 pieces of content that represent your brand voice:
Option B - Brand Description If you don't have content yet, describe:
I'll analyze patterns and create your voice guide."
Extract patterns across all samples:
Voice Patterns to Identify:
Vocabulary Patterns:
Tone Markers:
Use WebSearch to find:
Then synthesize a voice based on inputs.
## Voice DNA
### Brand Personality
[3-5 defining traits with explanations]
| Trait | What It Means | How It Shows Up |
|-------|---------------|-----------------|
| [Trait 1] | [Definition] | [Example in copy] |
| [Trait 2] | [Definition] | [Example in copy] |
| [Trait 3] | [Definition] | [Example in copy] |
### The Elevator Pitch
"We sound like [description]. Think [reference point] meets [reference point]."
### If Our Brand Were a Person
[2-3 sentence description of brand as human—age, profession, how they talk at a party]
## Tone Spectrum
Our voice stays consistent, but tone adapts to context.
| Context | Tone | Example |
|---------|------|---------|
| Homepage hero | Confident, bold | "Stop guessing. Start knowing." |
| Error message | Helpful, calm | "Something went wrong. Let's fix it together." |
| Success message | Warm, celebratory | "You did it! Your first campaign is live." |
| Sales email | Direct, valuable | "Here's what's working for teams like yours." |
| Support docs | Clear, patient | "First, open Settings. You'll find it in the top right." |
| Social media | Casual, engaging | "Hot take: [opinion]. Fight me in the comments." |
| Legal/Terms | Clear, straightforward | "Your data belongs to you. Here's exactly what we collect." |
### Tone Dial
**Formal ←――――――→ Casual**
[Mark where brand sits: e.g., "We sit at 3/10—professional but never stiff."]
**Serious ←――――――→ Playful**
[Mark where brand sits: e.g., "We sit at 6/10—we crack jokes but know when to be serious."]
**Reserved ←――――――→ Enthusiastic**
[Mark where brand sits: e.g., "We sit at 7/10—we're excited about what we do and it shows."]
## Structure
How pieces organize ideas — the architectural blueprint AI must follow.
### Opening Pattern
[How pieces begin: e.g., "Open with friction — a problem, tension, or surprising claim"]
### Body Organization
[How the middle works: e.g., "Alternate between concept and concrete example. Never explain without showing."]
### Closing Pattern
[How pieces end: e.g., "Land on a usable takeaway — something the reader can do today"]
### Transitions
[How sections connect: e.g., "Jump-cut between ideas. No 'Furthermore' or 'Additionally.'"]
## Signature Moves
Named techniques that make this voice distinctive. AI should deploy these at natural frequency.
| Move | Description | Frequency |
|------|-------------|-----------|
| [Name] | [What it looks like — e.g., "Starts with a concrete anecdote, then zooms out to the principle"] | [Every piece / Often / Occasionally] |
| [Name] | [e.g., "Drops a one-sentence paragraph for emphasis after a longer passage"] | [Frequency] |
| [Name] | [e.g., "Uses parenthetical asides to add personality — like this"] | [Frequency] |
### Moves to Avoid
| Move | Why It's Wrong |
|------|---------------|
| [Name] | [e.g., "Listicle structure — feels like content marketing, not our voice"] |
## Vocabulary
### Words We Love
| Word/Phrase | Why | Use When |
|-------------|-----|----------|
| [Word] | [Reason] | [Context] |
### Words We Avoid
| Avoid | Use Instead | Why |
|-------|-------------|-----|
| [Word] | [Alternative] | [Reason] |
### Industry Jargon Rules
[How much jargon is acceptable and when]
### Pronouns
- **We/Our**: [When to use]
- **You/Your**: [When to use]
- **I/My**: [When to use, if ever]
- **They/The company**: [When to use, if ever]
### Anti-Pattern Blacklist
Patterns to eliminate — these are structural, not just word-level:
| Pattern | Example | Fix |
|---------|---------|-----|
| [e.g., "Correlative construction"] | ["Not X, but Y"] | ["Rewrite as direct claim"] |
| [e.g., "Throat-clearing opener"] | ["In today's fast-paced world..."] | ["Cut to the point"] |
| [e.g., "Hedge stacking"] | ["It might perhaps be worth considering..."] | ["State the claim, then qualify once"] |
## Sentence Style
### Length
- **Target**: [X words average per sentence]
- **Mix**: [Short sentences for punch, longer for explanation]
- **Paragraphs**: [Max X sentences per paragraph]
### Structure Preferences
- **Contractions**: [Always/Sometimes/Never] — "you're" vs "you are"
- **Active voice**: [Percentage target] — "We built this" vs "This was built"
- **Starting sentences**: [Patterns to use/avoid]
- **Questions**: [Rhetorical? Direct? Frequency?]
### Punctuation
- **Exclamation points**: [Rules for usage]
- **Em dashes**: [Heavy use/light use]
- **Ellipses**: [Never/sparingly/frequently]
- **Oxford comma**: [Yes/No]
- **Emojis**: [Never/sparingly/frequently + which ones]
## Formatting
### Headlines
- **Case**: [Sentence case / Title Case]
- **Length**: [Max X words]
- **Punctuation**: [Period/No period]
### CTAs
- **Style**: [Action verb first]
- **Examples**: [List of preferred CTA phrases]
### Lists
- **Bullet style**: [Dashes/dots/checkmarks]
- **Capitalization**: [First word only / Each word]
- **Punctuation**: [Periods/No periods]
### Numbers
- **Spell out**: [One through ten / all / none]
- **Percentages**: [50% vs fifty percent]
- **Currency**: [$X vs X dollars]
## Do/Don't Examples
### Homepage Hero
❌ "Welcome to [Company]. We are the leading provider of innovative solutions."
✅ "[Bold claim that shows, not tells]."
### Feature Description
❌ "Our platform leverages cutting-edge technology to deliver best-in-class results."
✅ "[Specific outcome in plain language]."
### Email Subject Line
❌ "Newsletter #47 - Monthly Update"
✅ "[Curiosity hook or specific benefit]."
### Error Message
❌ "Error 403: Forbidden access denied."
✅ "[Human explanation + next step]."
### CTA Button
❌ "Submit" / "Click Here"
✅ "[Action + Outcome]" — "Start Free Trial" / "Get Your Report"
### Social Post
❌ "We are pleased to announce..."
✅ "[Direct statement or hook]."
## Revision Checklist
Run through before publishing. Each question should produce a confident "yes."
### Voice
- [ ] Does this sound like a real person — not a committee?
- [ ] Could this only be written by us/me? (Not generic AI)
- [ ] Are 2+ signature moves deployed naturally?
- [ ] Zero blacklisted patterns present?
### Tone
- [ ] Is the tone calibrated for this context?
- [ ] Does it match the tone dial positions?
### Language
- [ ] No words from the "avoid" list?
- [ ] Anti-pattern blacklist clear?
- [ ] Contractions/pronouns consistent?
### Structure
- [ ] Opening follows the structure pattern?
- [ ] Transitions feel like jump-cuts, not academic bridges?
- [ ] Closing lands on something usable?
### Gut Check
- [ ] Read it aloud — does it sound like talking, not writing?
Use "VOICE GUIDE" for personal, "BRAND VOICE GUIDE" for organizational.
# [BRAND] VOICE GUIDE: [Name]
*Version 1.0 | Created [Date] | Optimized for AI consumption*
---
## Quick Reference
**Voice:** [3 traits]
**Sounds like:** [1-sentence description]
**Never sounds:** [What to avoid]
---
## 1. VOICE DNA
[Personality traits + identity]
## 2. TONE SPECTRUM
[Context-based tone adjustments]
## 3. STRUCTURE PATTERNS
[Opening, body, closing, transition patterns]
## 4. SIGNATURE MOVES
[Named techniques with frequency]
## 5. VOCABULARY + ANTI-PATTERNS
[Words we love/avoid + structural blacklist]
## 6. SENTENCE STYLE
[Length, rhythm, punctuation rules]
## 7. FORMATTING
[Headlines, CTAs, lists, numbers]
## 8. DO/DON'T EXAMPLES
[Before/after examples by content type]
## 9. REVISION CHECKLIST
[Pre-publish validation questions]
## APPENDIX: Sample Rewrites
[Off-voice → on-voice with annotations]
After generating the guide, offer to save it:
docs/brand-voice.md (recommended)docs/style-guide.md or user's preferred location (e.g., Claude Projects)This voice guide works with:
content-writer - Apply voice to articlescontent-atomizer - Maintain voice across platformslinkedin-content - On-brand social postslanding-page-builder - Voice-aligned landing pagessales-page - Consistent sales messagingRelated skills:
style-forensics - Quantitative personal voice extraction (Style DNA reports)style-writer - Write new content matching a Style DNA or brand voicehumanizer - Strip AI tells while respecting style constraintsUsage pattern:
"Write this using the voice guide in docs/brand-voice.md"
Voice guides should be updated when:
Recommend quarterly reviews.