Show a complete r2r pipeline demo with sample output. Demonstrates what the Research-to-Roadmap plugin produces without running actual analysis.
When triggered, display this sample pipeline output:
Running the full pipeline on a hypothetical AI-powered code review POC...
š Production Readiness: 6/10
ā
VALIDATED:
- Core review logic works with GPT-4
- Catches 73% of common issues in test suite
- Average response time: 2.3s per file
ā ļø GAPS IDENTIFIED:
- No load testing performed
- Missing rate limiting
- Error handling incomplete
- No fallback for API failures
ā ASSUMPTIONS (unvalidated):
- Will scale to 100+ concurrent users
- Cost per review acceptable at scale
- Security review not completed
COMPONENTS IDENTIFIED:
āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā
ā [M] Core Review Engine ā
ā Depends on: None ā
ā Risk: Low ā
āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā¤
ā [S] Rate Limiter ā
ā Depends on: Core Engine ā
ā Risk: Low ā
āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā¤
ā [L] Load Testing Suite ā
ā Depends on: Core Engine ā
ā Risk: Medium ā
āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā¤
ā [M] Error Handling & Fallbacks ā
ā Depends on: Core Engine ā
ā Risk: Medium ā
āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā¤
ā [L] Security Hardening ā
ā Depends on: All components ā
ā Risk: High ā
āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā
HORIZON MAPPING:
H1 (Ship in 0-3 months):
šÆ Rate Limiter [S] - Quick win, low effort
šÆ Error Handling [M] - Required for production
H2 (Build in 3-6 months):
š Load Testing Suite [L] - Validates scale assumptions
š Security Hardening [L] - Required before public release
H3 (Explore 6-12 months):
š Multi-model support
š Custom rule engine
MILESTONES:
M1: Production MVP (Week 4)
āāā Rate limiting implemented
āāā Basic error handling
āāā Internal dogfooding begins
M2: Private Preview (Week 8)
āāā Load tested to 50 concurrent users
āāā Security review complete
āāā 10 beta customers onboarded
M3: Public Preview (Week 12)
āāā Load tested to 500 concurrent users
āāā SOC2 compliance verified
āāā Public waitlist opens
TIMELINE:
āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā
Week 1-4 āāāāāāāāāāāāāā M1: Production MVP
Week 5-8 āāāāāāāāāāāāāā M2: Private Preview
Week 9-12 āāāāāāāāāāāāāā M3: Public Preview
āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā
PRE-MORTEM ANALYSIS:
"The project failed because..."
ā We didn't account for API cost at scale
ā Security review found blocking issues late
ā Load testing revealed 10x slower than expected
MITIGATION ADDED:
ā
Cost modeling added to M1 criteria
ā
Security review moved to H1
ā
Performance benchmarks required for M2 gate
STATUS: ā ļø CAUTION - Proceed with identified mitigations
OUTPUT FILES:
.r2r/
āāā 01-assessment.md
āāā 02-components.md
āāā 03-priorities.md
āāā 04-roadmap.md
āāā 05-validation.md
āāā exports/
āāā github/
āāā milestones.json (3 milestones)
āāā issues/ (12 issues ready to import)
This is sample output. Run /r2r:full ./your-research on actual artifacts to generate real analysis.
Keep the output exactly as shown. This demonstrates the full pipeline capability.