Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) and Never Reinvent the Wheel (NRtW) - core b00t principles...
The DRY philosophy is a central tenet of b00t: YEI exist to contribute ONLY new and novel meaningful work. This skill helps you:
Activate this skill when you see:
AVOID writing code for functionality that exists in libraries:
โ Anti-pattern:
# Writing custom JSON parser
def parse_json(text):
# 200 lines of parsing logic...
โ DRY approach:
import json
data = json.loads(text)
SEARCH for existing solutions before coding:
# Search for Python packages
pip search [functionality]
# or
uv pip search [functionality]
# Check PyPI
https://pypi.org/search/?q=[functionality]
# Check Rust crates
https://crates.io/search?q=[functionality]
USE Rust for heavy lifting, expose to Python:
โ Anti-pattern:
# Duplicating Rust datum parsing in Python
def parse_datum_file(path: str) -> dict:
with open(path) as f:
toml_data = toml.load(f)
# Validation logic...
# Parsing logic...
return processed_data
โ DRY approach:
# Use Rust via PyO3
import b00t_pyverse
datum = b00t_pyverse.load_ai_model_datum("model-name", "~/.dotfiles/_b00t_")
Why? Rust implementation already exists, is faster, type-safe, and tested.
FORK and PATCH forward, don't maintain private copies:
โ Anti-pattern:
# Copy library code into project
cp -r /path/to/library my_project/vendored/
# Make private modifications
โ DRY approach:
# Fork the library
gh repo fork upstream/library
# Create patch
git checkout -b fix/issue-123
# Make changes
git commit -m "fix: resolve issue #123"
# Submit PR
gh pr create --upstream
# Use your fork temporarily
# pyproject.toml
dependencies = [
"library @ git+https://github.com/you/library@fix/issue-123"
]
Need to implement functionality?
โ
Does it already exist in a library?
โโ YES โ Use the library (DRY)
โโ NO โ
Is it standard functionality?
โโ YES โ Search harder, it probably exists
โโ NO โ
Does similar Rust code exist in b00t?
โโ YES โ Expose via PyO3 (DRY)
โโ NO โ
Is this truly novel?
โโ YES โ Implement (with tests!)
โโ NO โ Reconsider: use library
Task: Parse TOML files
# Search
pip search toml
# Results: tomli, tomlkit, pytoml
# Use established: tomli (or tomllib in Python 3.11+)
Task: Make HTTP requests
# DON'T: Write custom HTTP client
# DO: Use httpx or requests
pip install httpx
Task: Validate Pydantic models
# DON'T: Write custom validation
# DO: Use Pydantic's built-in validation
from pydantic import BaseModel, field_validator
b00t Pattern: Rust does heavy lifting, Python uses it.
โ Duplicate (Anti-pattern):
# b00t_j0b_py/datum_parser.py
import toml
class DatumParser:
def load_provider(self, name: str):
path = f"~/.dotfiles/_b00t_/{name}.ai.toml"
with open(os.path.expanduser(path)) as f:
data = toml.load(f)
# Validation...
# Parsing...
return data
โ DRY (Use Rust):
# Use PyO3 bindings
import b00t_pyverse
datum = b00t_pyverse.load_ai_model_datum("model-name", "~/.dotfiles/_b00t_")
Why better?
โ Duplicate:
def validate_provider_env(provider: str) -> bool:
# Read datum
# Parse required env vars
# Check os.environ
# Return result
โ DRY:
import b00t_pyverse
validation = b00t_pyverse.check_provider_env("openrouter", "~/.dotfiles/_b00t_")
if not validation["available"]:
print(f"Missing: {validation['missing_env_vars']}")
Scenario: Bug in pydantic-ai library
โ Anti-pattern:
# Copy code into project
cp -r site-packages/pydantic_ai b00t_j0b_py/vendored/
# Fix bug privately
# Now you maintain a fork forever
โ DRY approach:
# Fork
gh repo fork pydantic/pydantic-ai
# Fix and test
git checkout -b fix/agent-validation-bug
# Make changes
pytest tests/
git commit -m "fix: agent validation for None values"
# Submit PR
gh pr create --title "fix: agent validation for None values"
# Temporarily use your fork
# pyproject.toml
dependencies = [
"pydantic-ai @ git+https://github.com/elasticdotventures/pydantic-ai@fix/agent-validation-bug"
]
# After PR merged, switch back to upstream
dependencies = [
"pydantic-ai>=0.0.15" # includes fix
]
When choosing a library:
Use Rust for:
// b00t-pyverse/src/lib.rs
use pyo3::prelude::*;
#[pyfunction]
fn my_function(py: Python<'_>, arg: &str) -> PyResult<String> {
// Rust implementation
Ok(format!("Processed: {}", arg))
}
#[pymodule]
fn b00t_pyverse(_py: Python, m: &PyModule) -> PyResult<()> {
m.add_function(wrap_pyfunction!(my_function, m)?)?;
Ok(())
}
# Python usage
import b00t_pyverse
result = b00t_pyverse.my_function("test")
Before writing code, ask:
If all answers are "no", then implement.
โ Bad:
def read_json_file(path):
with open(path) as f:
return custom_json_parse(f.read())
โ Good:
import json
def read_json_file(path):
with open(path) as f:
return json.load(f)
โ Bad:
# Reimplementing datum validation in Python
class DatumValidator:
def validate_env(self, provider): ...
def parse_toml(self, path): ...
โ Good:
# Use Rust via PyO3
import b00t_pyverse
validation = b00t_pyverse.check_provider_env(provider, path)
โ Bad:
# Fork library, never contribute back
# Maintain private version forever
โ Good:
# Fork, fix, PR upstream
# Use fork temporarily until merged
# Switch back to upstream after merge
โ Bad:
def process_data(data):
# No types, unclear what's expected
return data.transform()
โ Good:
from pydantic import BaseModel
def process_data(data: dict[str, Any]) -> ProcessedData:
return ProcessedData(**data)
CLAUDE.md - YEI MUST ALWAYS/NEVER sectionb00t-pyverse/src/lib.rs - PyO3 bindings exampleb00t-j0b-py/pyproject.toml - Dependency managementDRY Philosophy:
Alignment: A lean hive is a happy hive. Finding and patching bugs in libraries is divine; committing buggy code is unforgivable.