Smithery Logo
MCPsSkillsDocsPricing
Login
Smithery Logo

Accelerating the Agent Economy

Resources

DocumentationPrivacy PolicySystem Status

Company

PricingAboutBlog

Connect

© 2026 Smithery. All rights reserved.

    brmatola

    investigating-a-codebase

    brmatola/investigating-a-codebase
    Coding
    1 installs

    About

    SKILL.md

    Install

    Install via Skills CLI

    or add to your agent
    • Claude Code
      Claude Code
    • Codex
      Codex
    • OpenClaw
      OpenClaw
    • Cursor
      Cursor
    • Amp
      Amp
    • GitHub Copilot
      GitHub Copilot
    • Gemini CLI
      Gemini CLI
    • Kilo Code
      Kilo Code
    • Junie
      Junie
    • Replit
      Replit
    • Windsurf
      Windsurf
    • Cline
      Cline
    • Continue
      Continue
    • OpenCode
      OpenCode
    • OpenHands
      OpenHands
    • Roo Code
      Roo Code
    • Augment
      Augment
    • Goose
      Goose
    • Trae
      Trae
    • Zencoder
      Zencoder
    • Antigravity
      Antigravity
    ├─
    ├─
    └─

    About

    Use when planning or designing features and need to understand current codebase state, find existing patterns, or verify assumptions about what exists - prevents hallucination by grounding plans in...

    SKILL.md

    Investigating a Codebase

    Overview

    Understand current codebase state to ground planning and design decisions in reality, not assumptions. Find existing patterns, verify design assumptions, and provide definitive answers about what exists and where.

    When to Use

    Use for:

    • Verifying design assumptions before implementation ("Design assumes auth.ts exists - verify")
    • Finding existing patterns to follow ("How do we currently handle API errors?")
    • Locating features or code ("Where is user authentication implemented?")
    • Understanding component architecture ("How does the routing system work?")
    • Confirming existence definitively ("Does feature X exist or not?")
    • Preventing hallucination about file paths and structure

    Don't use for:

    • Information available in external docs (use internet research)
    • Questions answered by reading 1-2 specific known files (use Read directly)
    • General programming questions not specific to this codebase

    Core Investigation Workflow

    1. Start with entry points - main files, index, package.json, config
    2. Use multiple search strategies - Glob patterns, Grep keywords, Read files
    3. Follow traces - imports, references, component relationships
    4. Verify don't assume - confirm file locations and structure
    5. Report definitively - exact paths or "not found" with search strategy

    Verifying Design Assumptions

    When given design assumptions to verify:

    1. Extract assumptions - list what design expects to exist
    2. Search for each - file paths, functions, patterns, dependencies
    3. Compare reality vs expectation - matches, discrepancies, additions, missing
    4. Report explicitly:
      • ✓ Confirmed: "Design assumption correct: auth.ts:42 has login()"
      • ✗ Discrepancy: "Design assumes auth.ts, found auth/index.ts instead"
        • Addition: "Found logout() not mentioned in design"
        • Missing: "Design expects resetPassword(), not found"

    Why this matters: Prevents implementation plans based on wrong assumptions about codebase structure.

    Quick Reference

    Task Strategy
    Where is X Glob likely names → Grep keywords → Read matches
    How does X work Find entry point → Follow imports → Read implementation
    What patterns exist Find examples → Compare implementations → Extract conventions
    Does X exist Multiple searches → Definitive yes/no → Evidence
    Verify assumptions Extract claims → Search each → Compare reality vs expectation

    Investigation Strategies

    Multiple search approaches:

    • Glob for file patterns across codebase
    • Grep for keywords, function names, imports
    • Read key files to understand implementation
    • Follow imports and references for relationships
    • Check package.json, config files for dependencies

    Don't stop at first result:

    • Explore multiple paths to verify findings
    • Cross-reference different areas of codebase
    • Confirm patterns are consistent not one-off
    • Follow both usage and definition traces

    Verify everything:

    • Never assume file locations - always verify with Read/Glob
    • Never assume structure - explore and confirm
    • Document search strategy when reporting "not found"
    • Distinguish "doesn't exist" from "couldn't locate"

    Reporting Findings

    Lead with direct answer:

    • Answer the question first
    • Supporting details second
    • Evidence with exact file paths and line numbers

    Provide actionable intelligence:

    • Exact file paths (src/auth/login.ts:42), not vague locations
    • Relevant code snippets showing current patterns
    • Dependencies and versions when relevant
    • Configuration files and current settings
    • Naming, structure, and testing conventions

    Handle "not found" confidently:

    • "Feature X does not exist" is valid and useful
    • Explain what you searched and where you looked
    • Suggest related code as starting point
    • Report negative findings prevents hallucination

    Common Mistakes

    Mistake Fix
    Assuming file locations Always verify with Read/Glob before reporting
    Stopping at first result Explore multiple paths to verify findings
    Vague locations ("in auth folder") Exact paths (src/auth/index.ts:42)
    Not documenting search strategy Explain what was checked when reporting "not found"
    Confusing "not found" types Distinguish "doesn't exist" from "couldn't locate"
    Skipping design assumption comparison Explicitly report: confirmed/discrepancy/addition/missing
    Reporting assumptions as facts Only report what was verified in codebase
    Recommended Servers
    Vercel Grep
    Vercel Grep
    Exa Search
    Exa Search
    Context7
    Context7
    Repository
    brmatola/gremlins
    Files