Smithery Logo
MCPsSkillsDocsPricing
Login
Smithery Logo

Accelerating the Agent Economy

Resources

DocumentationPrivacy PolicySystem Status

Company

PricingAboutBlog

Connect

© 2026 Smithery. All rights reserved.

    bear2u

    codex-claude-loop

    bear2u/codex-claude-loop
    AI & ML
    721
    1 installs

    About

    SKILL.md

    Install

    Install via Skills CLI

    or add to your agent
    • Claude Code
      Claude Code
    • Codex
      Codex
    • OpenClaw
      OpenClaw
    • Cursor
      Cursor
    • Amp
      Amp
    • GitHub Copilot
      GitHub Copilot
    • Gemini CLI
      Gemini CLI
    • Kilo Code
      Kilo Code
    • Junie
      Junie
    • Replit
      Replit
    • Windsurf
      Windsurf
    • Cline
      Cline
    • Continue
      Continue
    • OpenCode
      OpenCode
    • OpenHands
      OpenHands
    • Roo Code
      Roo Code
    • Augment
      Augment
    • Goose
      Goose
    • Trae
      Trae
    • Zencoder
      Zencoder
    • Antigravity
      Antigravity
    ├─
    ├─
    └─

    About

    Orchestrates a dual-AI engineering loop where Claude Code plans and implements, while Codex validates and reviews, with continuous feedback for optimal code quality

    SKILL.md

    Codex-Claude Engineering Loop Skill

    Core Workflow Philosophy

    This skill implements a balanced engineering loop:

    • Claude Code: Architecture, planning, and execution
    • Codex: Validation and code review
    • Continuous Review: Each AI reviews the other's work
    • Context Handoff: Always continue with whoever last cleaned up

    Phase 1: Planning with Claude Code

    1. Start by creating a detailed plan for the task
    2. Break down the implementation into clear steps
    3. Document assumptions and potential issues
    4. Output the plan in a structured format

    Phase 2: Plan Validation with Codex

    1. Ask user (via AskUserQuestion):
      • Model: gpt-5 or gpt-5-codex
      • Reasoning effort: low, medium, or high
    2. Send the plan to Codex for validation:
       echo "Review this implementation plan and identify any issues:
       [Claude's plan here]
       
       Check for:
       - Logic errors
       - Missing edge cases
       - Architecture flaws
       - Security concerns" | codex exec -m  --config model_reasoning_effort="" --sandbox read-only
    
    1. Capture Codex's feedback

    Phase 3: Feedback Loop

    If Codex finds issues:

    1. Summarize Codex's concerns to the user
    2. Refine the plan based on feedback
    3. Ask user (via AskUserQuestion): "Should I revise the plan and re-validate, or proceed with fixes?"
    4. Repeat Phase 2 if needed

    Phase 4: Execution

    Once the plan is validated:

    1. Claude implements the code using available tools (Edit, Write, Read, etc.)
    2. Break down implementation into manageable steps
    3. Execute each step carefully with proper error handling
    4. Document what was implemented

    Phase 5: Cross-Review After Changes

    After every change:

    1. Send Claude's implementation to Codex for review:
      • Bug detection
      • Performance issues
      • Best practices validation
      • Security vulnerabilities
    2. Claude analyzes Codex's feedback and decides:
      • Apply fixes immediately if issues are critical
      • Discuss with user if architectural changes needed
      • Document decisions made

    Phase 6: Iterative Improvement

    1. After Codex review, Claude applies necessary fixes
    2. For significant changes, send back to Codex for re-validation
    3. Continue the loop until code quality standards are met
    4. Use codex exec resume --last to continue validation sessions:
       echo "Review the updated implementation" | codex exec resume --last
    

    Note: Resume inherits all settings (model, reasoning, sandbox) from original session

    Recovery When Issues Are Found

    When Codex identifies problems:

    1. Claude analyzes the root cause
    2. Implements fixes using available tools
    3. Sends updated code back to Codex for verification
    4. Repeats until validation passes

    When implementation errors occur:

    1. Claude reviews the error/issue
    2. Adjusts implementation strategy
    3. Re-validates with Codex before proceeding

    Best Practices

    • Always validate plans before execution
    • Never skip cross-review after changes
    • Maintain clear handoff between AIs
    • Document who did what for context
    • Use resume to preserve session state

    Command Reference

    Phase Command Pattern Purpose
    Validate plan echo "plan" | codex exec --sandbox read-only Check logic before coding
    Implement Claude uses Edit/Write/Read tools Claude implements the validated plan
    Review code echo "review changes" | codex exec --sandbox read-only Codex validates Claude's implementation
    Continue review echo "next step" | codex exec resume --last Continue validation session
    Apply fixes Claude uses Edit/Write tools Claude fixes issues found by Codex
    Re-validate echo "verify fixes" | codex exec resume --last Codex re-checks after fixes

    Error Handling

    1. Stop on non-zero exit codes from Codex
    2. Summarize Codex feedback and ask for direction via AskUserQuestion
    3. Before implementing changes, confirm approach with user if:
      • Significant architectural changes needed
      • Multiple files will be affected
      • Breaking changes are required
    4. When Codex warnings appear, Claude evaluates severity and decides next steps

    The Perfect Loop

    Plan (Claude) → Validate Plan (Codex) → Feedback →
    Implement (Claude) → Review Code (Codex) →
    Fix Issues (Claude) → Re-validate (Codex) → Repeat until perfect
    

    This creates a self-correcting, high-quality engineering system where:

    • Claude handles all code implementation and modifications
    • Codex provides validation, review, and quality assurance
    Recommended Servers
    Vercel Grep
    Vercel Grep
    GitHub
    GitHub
    OpenZeppelin
    OpenZeppelin
    Repository
    bear2u/my-skills
    Files