Multi-model code review with structured feedback using LLM Council peer evaluation. Use for PR reviews, code quality checks, or implementation review. Keywords: code review, PR, pull request, quality...
Get multiple AI perspectives on code changes with structured, actionable feedback.
mcp:llm-council/verify with code-review rubric| Parameter | Type | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
snapshot_id |
string | required | Git commit SHA for reproducibility |
file_paths |
list | null | List of files to review (full file analysis) |
git_diff |
string | null | Unified diff format for change-focused review |
rubric_focus |
string | null | Focus area: "Security", "Performance", etc. |
tier |
string | "high" | Confidence tier: "quick", "balanced", "high", "reasoning" |
| Tier | Use When | Timeout |
|---|---|---|
balanced |
Routine code reviews | ~90s |
high |
Quality-critical reviews (default) | ~180s |
reasoning |
Complex architectural or security reviews | ~600s |
Supports both:
file_paths: List of files to review (full file analysis)git_diff: Unified diff format for change-focused reviewsnapshot_id: Git commit SHA (required for reproducibility)| Dimension | Weight | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy | 35% | Correctness, no bugs, logic errors |
| Completeness | 20% | All requirements addressed |
| Clarity | 20% | Readable, maintainable code |
| Conciseness | 15% | No unnecessary complexity |
| Relevance | 10% | Addresses stated requirements |
{
"verdict": "pass|fail|unclear",
"confidence": 0.82,
"rubric_scores": {
"accuracy": 7.5,
"completeness": 8.0,
"clarity": 9.0,
"conciseness": 8.5,
"relevance": 9.0
},
"blocking_issues": [
{
"severity": "major",
"file": "src/api.py",
"line": 42,
"message": "Missing input validation"
}
],
"rationale": "Overall, the code is well-structured...",
"partial": false,
"timeout_fired": false,
"completed_stages": ["stage1", "stage2", "stage3"]
}
If timeout_fired: true, the review timed out. Check completed_stages to see progress. Consider using a faster tier or reducing the number of files.
# Review specific files
council-review --file-paths "src/main.py,src/utils.py" --snapshot abc123
# Review git diff
council-review --git-diff "$(git diff HEAD~1)" --snapshot $(git rev-parse HEAD)
# Review with custom focus
council-review --rubric-focus Security --file-paths "src/auth.py"
# Deep reasoning review for complex changes
council-review --snapshot $(git rev-parse HEAD) --tier reasoning --rubric-focus Security
references/code-review-rubric.md for detailed scoring anchorscouncil-verify: General verificationcouncil-gate: CI/CD quality gate
