Binding Characterization: SPR and BLI
SPR vs BLI Decision Matrix
| Factor |
Choose SPR |
Choose BLI |
| Sensitivity |
Small molecules, fragments (<500 Da) |
Large complexes, antibodies |
| Throughput |
Low-medium (serial) |
High (96-well parallel) |
| Sample purity |
Required (clogs fluidics) |
Tolerates crude lysates |
| Kinetic resolution |
Higher (better for fast kinetics) |
Lower |
| Mass transport |
More sensitive (may distort kon) |
Less sensitive |
| Maintenance |
High (fluidics system) |
Low (dip-and-read) |
| Sample consumption |
Higher (continuous flow) |
Lower |
| Cost per experiment |
Lower chip cost, higher run cost |
Higher tip cost, lower run cost |
Key differences
SPR (Surface Plasmon Resonance)
- Mechanism: Detects refractive index changes at gold surface
- Surface: Gold chip with dextran matrix (CM5, CM7, etc.)
- Flow: Continuous microfluidics
- Best for: Small molecules, high-affinity, precise kon/koff
BLI (Biolayer Interferometry)
- Mechanism: Measures optical interference pattern shift
- Surface: Fiber optic biosensor tips (SA, Ni-NTA, AHC)
- Flow: Dip-and-read (no microfluidics)
- Best for: High-throughput, crude samples, antibody screening
Troubleshooting: Why BLI works but SPR doesn't
| Cause |
Mechanism |
Solution |
| Hydrophobic CDRs |
Adsorb to SPR gold/dextran surface |
Add 0.05% Tween-20, use CM7 chip with longer dextran |
| Aggregation |
Mass transport artifacts in SPR fluidics |
Filter sample (0.22μm), reduce ligand density |
| High instability |
Degrades during continuous flow |
Shorter cycle time, add stabilizers (trehalose 5%) |
| Charge mismatch |
Nonspecific binding to charged dextran |
Adjust buffer pH ±1 from pI, add BSA 1mg/mL |
| Slow dissociation |
Long regeneration needed (damages ligand) |
Use BLI (disposable tips) |
Why SPR works but BLI doesn't
| Cause |
Mechanism |
Solution |
| Small analyte |
BLI less sensitive for <10 kDa |
Use SPR with appropriate chip |
| Weak affinity (KD >10μM) |
Fast dissociation in BLI dip |
Increase analyte concentration |
| Low expression |
Not enough signal |
Increase biosensor loading |
Mass transport considerations
Mass transport limitation occurs when analyte cannot diffuse to the surface fast enough to maintain equilibrium. This distorts kinetic parameters.
Symptoms
- Observed kon appears slower than true kon
- Linear association phase (instead of exponential)
- kon varies with ligand density
- Rmax varies with flow rate
When mass transport matters
- High-affinity interactions (kon >10^6 M^-1s^-1)
- High ligand density (>500 RU)
- Slow flow rates (<30 μL/min in SPR)
- Large analytes (slow diffusion)
Mitigation strategies
| Strategy |
SPR |
BLI |
| Reduce ligand density |
<200 RU for high-affinity |
<0.5 nm shift loading |
| Increase flow rate |
50-100 μL/min |
Increase shake speed (1000 rpm) |
| Use oriented immobilization |
His-tag capture |
Biotinylated ligand |
| Include in fitting |
Mass transport model (kt) |
Usually less critical |
Nonspecific binding mitigation
Buffer additives (ranked by effectiveness)
| Additive |
Concentration |
Mechanism |
Best For |
| BSA |
0.5-1 mg/mL |
Blocks hydrophobic sites |
General use |
| Tween-20 |
0.02-0.05% |
Prevents surface adsorption |
Hydrophobic analytes |
| Trehalose |
1-5% |
Stabilizes + blocks |
Unstable proteins |
| Sucrose |
5% |
BLI-specific blocker |
BLI tips |
| Carboxymethyl dextran |
1 mg/mL |
Competitive blocking |
SPR with charged proteins |
| NaCl |
150-500 mM |
Reduces ionic interactions |
Charged proteins |
pH optimization
- Keep buffer pH at least 1 unit away from analyte pI
- pI near 7: Use pH 6.0 or 8.0 buffer
- Acidic proteins (pI <5): Use neutral or basic buffer
- Basic proteins (pI >9): Use slightly acidic buffer
Reference subtraction
Always include:
- Blank reference channel (no ligand)
- Buffer-only injections
- Non-specific binding controls
Regeneration conditions
SPR regeneration scouting (try in order)
| Condition |
Targets |
Caution |
| 10 mM Glycine pH 2.0-2.5 |
Most protein-protein |
May denature ligand |
| 10 mM Glycine pH 1.5 |
Strong interactions |
Harsh, limit exposure |
| 1-2 M NaCl |
Ionic interactions |
Mild, try first |
| 10 mM NaOH |
Very stable ligands |
Can hydrolyze proteins |
| 10 mM Glycine pH 9-10 |
Acid-stable proteins |
Can aggregate |
| 10 mM EDTA |
His-tag, metal-dependent |
Strips Ni-NTA |
| 4 M MgCl2 |
Hydrophobic interactions |
Check ligand stability |
Regeneration protocol
- Start with mildest condition (high salt)
- Test 30s contact time
- Verify complete dissociation (return to baseline)
- Verify retained ligand activity (repeat binding)
- Use shortest effective contact time
BLI tips
- Tips are often disposable (no regeneration needed)
- For reuse: Same conditions as SPR, but shorter exposure
- Anti-His tips: 10 mM Glycine pH 1.5, 30s
- Streptavidin tips: Generally not regenerable
Common artifacts and solutions
Biphasic binding
Symptoms: Two-rate association or dissociation
Causes:
- Sample heterogeneity (aggregates)
- Ligand heterogeneity (multiple conformations)
- Avidity effects (bivalent analyte)
Solutions:
- Filter/centrifuge sample
- Use monovalent Fab fragments
- Reduce ligand density
- Fit to heterogeneous model
Negative dissociation
Symptoms: Signal increases during dissociation phase
Causes:
- Ligand leaching from surface
- Analyte aggregation on surface
- Reference channel drift
Solutions:
- Use capture antibody instead of direct immobilization
- Increase buffer stringency
- Better reference subtraction
Hook effect
Symptoms: Signal decreases at high analyte concentrations
Causes:
- Surface saturation + rebinding suppression
- Crowding effects
Solutions:
- Reduce analyte concentration range
- Reduce ligand density
- Use smaller analyte fragments
Kinetic data quality checklist
Before analysis
Fitting quality
Red flags
- kon approaching the mass transport limit (>10^7 M^-1s^-1), where rates are unreliable
- koff too fast to sample (> 0.1 s^-1) or too slow to measure in the dissociation window (< 10^-5 s^-1)
- Rmax >> theoretical maximum (aggregation or avidity)
- Large difference between kinetic and equilibrium KD
References
Platform comparisons
SPR protocols
Troubleshooting
Regeneration
Mass transport