Curriculum Reviewer Skill
This skill comprehensively reviews educational materials for quality, pedagogical soundness, and consistency.
When to Use
Use this skill when the user:
- Asks to review curriculum or lesson materials
- Wants quality assurance on educational content
- Requests feedback on teaching materials
- Needs consistency check across multiple lessons
- Wants to audit materials before publishing
- Asks for improvement recommendations
What This Skill Does
Identifies Scope of review:
- Entire curriculum
- Specific class or lesson
- Specific material type (lessons, slides, assessments)
- Particular aspects (pedagogy, formatting, alignment)
Invokes Multiple Subagents for comprehensive review:
lesson-planner subagent reviews:
- Learning objectives alignment
- Pedagogical soundness
- Timing and pacing realism
- Differentiation strategies
- Hands-on activity quality
- Assessment alignment with objectives
slide-designer subagent reviews:
- Slide clarity and visual design
- One-idea-per-slide principle
- Formatting consistency
- Engagement elements
- Presenter notes quality
assessment-builder subagent reviews:
- Rubric clarity and fairness
- Criteria alignment with objectives
- Performance level descriptions
- Example quality and usefulness
- Student-friendly language
github-stylist subagent reviews:
- Markdown formatting consistency
- Professional appearance
- Navigation and linking
- README completeness
- Overall polish
Creates Comprehensive Review Report with:
- Strengths Identified: What's working well
- Areas for Improvement: Specific issues found
- Recommendations: Concrete suggestions for fixes
- Priority Levels: Critical vs. nice-to-have improvements
- Consistency Issues: Patterns across materials
- Alignment Check: Objectives → content → assessment
Offers Action Plan:
- Prioritized list of improvements
- Option to apply automated fixes
- Suggestions for manual edits
Review Criteria
Pedagogical Quality:
- Clear, measurable learning objectives
- Age-appropriate content and examples
- Effective differentiation strategies
- Authentic, hands-on activities
- Aligned assessments
Content Quality:
- Accurate information
- Relevant, current examples
- Clear explanations
- Logical progression
- Complete materials
Consistency:
- Formatting uniformity
- Style consistency
- Voice and tone
- Terminology usage
- Visual presentation
Usability:
- Ready-to-teach materials
- Clear instructions
- Appropriate timing
- Necessary resources listed
- Student-facing clarity
Output Structure
Review reports include:
- Executive Summary: Overview of findings
- Detailed Findings by category
- Specific Examples of issues
- Recommendations with priority
- Consistency Analysis across materials
- Action Items checklist
Example Usage
User: "Review all the Class 1 materials and make sure everything is high quality"
This skill will conduct a comprehensive review and provide detailed feedback with recommendations.
